Website audit

Search readiness report

A technical baseline for Cedar Studio. These checks describe the sampled pages, not a prediction of traffic or rankings.

A useful foundation, with three gaps to address first.

Overall readiness68 / 100
Website
cedar.example
Scope
12 sampled pages
Checked
12 October 2026
Public pages, sampled crawl

Unavailable checks are excluded. This is a point-in-time assessment.

See recommended changes

Assessment

What was checked

Read each module independently. A missing assessment is not a failed check.

Crawl and discovery

Assessed

Crawl and discovery82 / 100
  • The sitemap is reachable.
  • Two sampled pages are missing canonical URLs.

Structured data

Needs attention

Structured data45 / 100
  • Organization markup is present.
  • Service pages have no matching structured data.

Accessibility

Not assessed — excluded from the overall score

AccessibilityNot assessed — excluded from the overall score
  • The automated browser check did not complete.

Content readiness

Waiting for assessment

Content readinessWaiting for assessment

    Next moves

    Fix these first

    An ordered shortlist. Confirm each finding before changing the site.

    1. Give every service page a canonical URL

      High impactSmall effortPage-level

      Two sampled service pages do not declare their preferred URL.

      Add self-referencing canonical tags, then check the rendered HTML.

      Open implementation notes

    2. Describe the organization consistently

      Medium impactSmall effortSite-wide

      Organization details differ between the homepage and service pages.

      Use one set of organization details and validate the structured data.